×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Preferred Plans and Draft Master Plan

The following are the work session documents that will be reviewed at the next Planning & Zoning meeting on May 20, 2025. Navigate the dropdown menu to view:

1. The Preferred Plans by Dig - these are based on the feedback from the previous work session.

2. The DRAFT Master Plan Chapters 1-3

3. The DRAFT Master Plan Chapter 4

4. The DRAFT Master Plan Chapter 5

Comments are now CLOSED. You can still view the comments that were made. 
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Drag
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
Previous
Next
View all

Comments

Close

Commenting is closed for this document.

tom white May 16 2025 at 4:43PM on page 1

LEAVE THIS WHO PLACE VALONE, WILL NEVER BE AFFORABLE & JUST MORE BLIND GREED

Tracy May 16 2025 at 12:03PM on page 5

Please consider more of a buffer and not putting a tall building this close to the Outer Limits/Bottom Out trail junction. Concerned about runoff down Bottom OUt, which is a popular Trail

Tracy May 16 2025 at 12:02PM on page 5

Prefer Option 2.
1) more open space
2) better placement of rec center
3) better connection to Girdner TH

Lori Feine May 16 2025 at 9:18AM on page 1

Suggestion
I understand the perceived need for housing, however allowing building of 3 and 4 stories will set a precedent within the City and eventually the Village (county). The density of this new area seems very high with these larger structures that are being proposed. I suggest you consider cutting the 3 and 4 story units down to 2 story which would still allow approximately 140 new housing units in Block 7. Also cutting the 3 story units in Block 5 down to 2 story will still provide 80 new units. Between those two areas this would take 400 potential units down to 220 - still a huge improvement over what we have today. That combined with other City projects already in progress should provide sufficient housing.

Lori Feine May 16 2025 at 9:17AM on page 1

Suggestion
I understand the perceived need for housing, however allowing building of 3 and 4 stories will set a precedent within the City and eventually the Village (county). The density of this new area seems very high with these larger structures that are being proposed. I suggest you consider cutting the 3 and 4 story units down to 2 story which would still allow approximately 140 new housing units in Block 7. Also cutting the 3 story units in Block 5 down to 2 story will still provide 80 new units. Between those two areas this would take 400 potential units down to 220 - still a huge improvement over what we have today. That combined with other City projects already in progress should provide sufficient housing.

Lori Feine May 16 2025 at 9:17AM on page 1

Suggestion
I understand the perceived need for housing, however allowing building of 3 and 4 stories will set a precedent within the City and eventually the Village (county). The density of this new area seems very high with these larger structures that are being proposed. I suggest you consider cutting the 3 and 4 story units down to 2 story which would still allow approximately 140 new housing units in Block 7. Also cutting the 3 story units in Block 5 down to 2 story will still provide 80 new units. Between those two areas this would take 400 potential units down to 220 - still a huge improvement over what we have today. That combined with other City projects already in progress should provide sufficient housing.

Lori Feine May 16 2025 at 9:06AM on page 1

Question
Will this new intersection become another stop light? or will it be right turn only. That is a 4-lane road with a relatively high speed. It should not allow a left turn unless there is a signal.

Lori Feine May 16 2025 at 9:04AM on page 1

Suggestion
Community Garden is a nice idea however, I'm not convinced it will be utilized. There is a community garden in the village that is not 100% utilized. I've seen gardens in other states/cities that are underutilized and become an eyesore. Even when used, the area isn't 'pretty' with shade structures erected to protect the plants from the sun and heat. Maybe you are assuming the residents of the new housing will use the garden? Additional green space might be more manageablle.

Amy May 15 2025 at 3:55PM on page 4

Suggestion
Take away from the mixed use space and make the community garden larger. This project is being paid for by the community, a large community garden would benefit the community members, especially since housing is being built for those who need affordable housing.

Amy May 15 2025 at 3:35PM on page 4

Suggestion
The commercial and office use at this site should be severely limited. Make this an open land area.

Amy May 15 2025 at 3:30PM on page 4

Suggestion
All housing units should be 2 story max. Why have tall units that block the beauty of the National Forest? Let's keeps Sedona a serene and welcoming place, not make it into an overcrowded tourist town. The total number of housing units should be 300 or less, these plans are way to dense.

Kaylee Fryek May 14 2025 at 3:13PM on page 1

Suggestion
We strongly oppose developing this land for housing; it was paid for by all taxpayers and should be enjoyed by everyone, local and visitors, not just the few that will get to live there.

Strongly support a community center! If possible, a community center and revitalizing the amphitheater but if not possible for both then support the community center and open space.

If no community center then support leaving it open space for everyone to enjoy and no housing development. There are plenty of housing opportunities in existing residential areas such as on Shelby Road by the recycle center and Sunset Drive next to existing high density housing.

Carol May 14 2025 at 11:25AM on page 5

Appreciate the amount of open and community space on this plan. Around 400 units seems like a good balance.

Carol May 14 2025 at 11:24AM on page 4

Great place for 3 story multi family housing.

Carol May 14 2025 at 11:23AM on page 4

Suggestion
The 3 and 4 story buildings should not be visible from the trails.

Peter May 14 2025 at 9:15AM on page 1

Suggestion
Take out the community garden and put in a community pool, perhaps two. Most large complexes have at least one. Big enough for both excercise, kids and cooling off. Pools in the desert are not only needed, but they add a sense of luxury and relaxation and are very desirable to renters. Renters are willing to pay more for them. Install solar heating for year round use.

Lars R. May 14 2025 at 8:26AM on page 2

Suggestion
This is a poor location for the rec center which would impact the great potential for an open outdoor space with great sunset views. This location is best for a venue to host a multitude of community events.

Lars R. May 14 2025 at 8:23AM on page 5

Suggestion
This park area is in the best spot and would support a multitude of great experiences for the community. Only ask would be to have the plan include the actual foot print and draft of the adjacent USFS TH redesign.

Lars R. May 14 2025 at 8:17AM on page 5

Suggestion
Care should be take to ensure the height of the building does not obstruct the western sky view. Sunset Views from proposed park and new western gateway trailhead would be impacted with 4 stories. 4 stories would cover over the horizon especially the 2 most northwestern apartment buildings. The view shed from the current area the public views the sunset and the proposed park should supersede the view shed from highway 89A.
View all