×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Alternative Concepts

While the Alternative Concepts can still be viewed, the comment period is closed. Please pay attention to website updates for opportunities to provide feedback as the Master Plan is further defined and moves through the review process.

The following 4 alternative scenarios were presented at the February 19, 2025 public meeting by the project consultant, Dig Studios See the meeting presentation for an introduction, background information, and context useful when reviewing the scenarios.

Please note: these are preliminary conceptual scenarios for the purpose of eliciting feedback on preferences for general elements and layout. These are not intended to include specific design details.

To see each concept, use the drop-down box above the document, or tap the next button below the document.  

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Commenting is closed for this document.


Question
Although a water tank is needed for so much development it's an eyesore and who would want that.
in reply to Fred Winkler's comment
Suggestion
Sedona is overgrowing! This height and density is appalling and completely unnecessary. Don't spoil our city for the sake of development. Open space with trails and activities not buildings and parking lots. Inappropriate and insult to Sedona's!
Suggestion
Density is too high. Average density from public input via bubble exercise is 178.
Suggestion
Two 7 story buildings here are inappropriate.
Suggestion
7 stories is an unreasonable height for housing in this area. The housing plans are too close to the existing FS trails like outer limits and bottom out. If housing is required at this location, it should be limited to at most 2 stories and located near 89A not the existing FS trails.
in reply to Fred Winkler's comment
I agree
Question
All plans - where is the plan for trail users to get to the Girdner TH - where are the pathways & trails?
Suggestion
Taller structures should be on 89A not next to the Forest and trail system.
Suggestion
This corner is closest to the trails in all designs (Outer Limits and Bottom Out). In all designs - 1) don't put anything tall here that obstructs experience / views of trail users 2) pay to have the trails moved, so the development does not sit on top of the trails and impact the trail experience.
Suggestion
71% of survey respondents indicated Support for a City and Forest Service partnership to build an enhanced and expanded trailhead? None of the designs show this and no communication of trails/pathways to get to the FS trails and Girdner TH.
Question
I attended the first meeting And at least 50% of the attendees wanted some sort of music venue? What happened to that? Looks to me like it was completely ignored?
Also what about the existing trails and access to them. Looks like outer limits and bottom out are being completely disregarded.
Suggestion
Seven stories?
That's a real eyesore and taller than most of the formations out in the valley
Suggestion
the trailhead is a mere afterthought = you will have people parking in all the retail and houses if this is all you offer
Suggestion
ABSOLUTELY NO HOUSING of any type in this area.